Thursday, May 21, 2009

Ethnic Blog 1

As I begin, the British settled and colonized the Americas and the people they encountered we different in religion, dress, custom, and government. The British racialized what they saw as the “savage” nature of Native American culture and societies. First I will begin with telling you the definition of “savage” and radicalization to make my essay flow together. The British thought the Native Americans were “savage” nature of Native American culture and societies. This basically means the Native Americans were “different” than the British. Their ways seemed savage to whites, and they were very suspicious of their culture because it was different than their culture. According to Omni and Winant racialization is an ideological process, a specific one. They also say that we employ the term racialization to signify the extension of racial meaning to a previously unclassified relationship, social practice or group. So to continue, what did the British base this racialization? The British based this racialization against the Native Americans based on supposed racial and cultural superiority. Native Americans are pre-Revolution colonies, even as much as they might even be murdered in accordance with the British law. The British racialized Native people as “savages” because they were different in race and culture. The effects of this were while the colonists battled the British for independence, taking Native American land the effects were different about race and racial differences were beginning to change. Also with the end of Reconstruction in 1877, the emergent class struggles and the definition of the working class was in racial terms as “white.” The working class was affected by this and this perpetuated the color line within the working class. The last topic I will talk about is how we can see resonances of this racial formation in contemporary popular culture. It was stated in the article by Omi and Winant that class politics lost much of its resonance in a postindustrial economy, such as class formation and the developing forms of popular culture in U.S. history. In the more recent economic transformations the U.S. have also altered interpretations of racial identities and meanings. In today’s society we refer to colored people as “blacks” just because they are different, and even now some of us believe that people with different skin color or are from a different culture are viewed as “different,” because we are white, Caucasian Americans. This also affects getting jobs for some that are of a different skin color. It is bad to say, but in the U.S. and other countries some people treat others of a different ethnic background differently just because they are from another culture. Once everyone understands that discrimination and prejudice is wrong and that everyone should be treated equally, then everyone will have a fair chance. We should understand that everyone is different, but just because they have a different skin color or are from a different culture does not mean we should treat them any differently. In conclusion, race should be understood as unstable and “decentered” complex of social meanings constantly being transformed by political struggle. This was stated in the article Racial Formations by Omi and Winant.

6 comments:

  1. I found your statement; "This also affects getting jobs for some that are of a different color." interesting. It reminded me of the taxi story in Chp. 1 of Takaki's book. He stated that he was often asked about where he was from because of his skin color and facial characteristics. I could see these types of questions also extending to a name. When looking through resumes you read the name and sometimes get a mental image of what the person could look like. However when you interview them you can be surprised by the person walking in. Sometimes you may assume they are male and a female walks in or you could assume the person will be of eastern descent and instead a "white" person walks in. So not only could the color of someone’s skin keep them from getting a job but their name could lead them to not even get an interview.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So, “savage” = “different” (at least where the British colonizers were concerned) and inferior. I would agree with that, but did you see any connection between how the British viewed the Indians and the way they viewed the Irish? Do you think that could have something to do with their feelings of and actions toward the Natives?
    To quote you, you said, “Native Americans are pre-Revolution colonies, even as much as they might even be murdered in accordance with the British law.” Sorry to be difficult, but couldn't you explain what you mean? I'm afraid I don't understand the sentence.
    I really like that you use Omi and Winant to support your arguments. I think maybe what they stated helped you see how the problems created by the British settlers are mirrored in today's society. I think that you should use a few more examples, earlier in your essay, from A Different Mirror. I think you might understand some of the concepts better if you used that. For instance, I don't think that Takaki put a big emphasis on “whiteness” playing a factor in the view of Indian culture as “savage.” Sure, I think that came as part of a “package deal,” but I don't believe that this is emphasized (at least not in this specific case) by Takaki. Though, perhaps I missed something and I'm completely wrong in saying that.
    Lastly, I honestly don't believe that it's bad that you've said that “in the U.S. and other countries some people treat others of a different ethnic background differently just because they are from another culture.” It's not bad to say this; you're simply stating the truth! As I've stressed in a few other posts, it seems that many of these people you've mentioned are very uncomfortable with anything that is different from what they are used to. I think many of the problems in society start right there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am going to further comment on Leslie's comment. I agree that it is wrong to judge a person based on their skin color or the way they look, but the reality is that people do do this on a daily basis. If i was a restauant owner or some other type of manager i would not want "trashy" looking people work for me in fear of not getting a lot of business or that customers would think that the stuff would be dirty or something. Those people might be the nicest people in the world and it is sad that poeple would judge them just based on their appearance. Maybe the interview process should change?? Maybe the manager should read the resume and just call them or something instead of basing them on how they look?... those are just a few questions

    ReplyDelete
  4. Treating cultures differently does not have to be a bad thing. Different cultures have different rules so sometimes something you would do at a gathering with people from the same culture as you may be looked down upon if you did the same thing with a group from a different culture. For example the handshake is very common in the West however their are cultures that feel any public body contact is unnecessary. So you could easily offend some when offering your hand in greeting. Another example would be giving flowers. When invited to dinner at someone’s home you may bring some type of gift. However you would need to be careful depending on their culture. For example in Asia plants as gifts are not appropriate because it means that you do not feel comfortable with the hostess.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really thought that savage ment a little more than different but I understand where you are coming from. The British did not have a very good first impression with the Native Americans and I think that is what affected their relationship from there on. Personally I beleive if the natives where wearing clothes and had a township structure their would not have been this big controversy that we are having now. Impressions mean alot to everyone and affect the way that relationships form.

    Also I would like to expand on your comment on the way that jobs are affected because of ethnicity. Ethnicity can be a factor on because of past experience and personal beliefs. If I was picking a person with similar resume's, I might just pick the conservative approach in a white person. I know that it seems to be a little racist but I believe that most managers are conservative and would do something similar. I have worked with many people that are black and white on a farm and from my past experience I would with know questions asked hire a white person over a black person just because of my past experience. I don't feal that this is the right way to believe but from me being conservative small town farmer I have a hard feeling otherwise. My work ethic is much stronger than any person that I have met in college to this point and I believe that it is because of my hometown surroundings. I do believe that the US and other countries that are have a problem with ethnicity do have problems at waiting for them. It is something hard to overcome because there are many people that don't have that experience to grow up with different ethnic groups. At my town there where no blacks and only mexicans came in to pick the tomatoes. This problem of being prejudist is very strong in my county and I really wish that this would change. I believe that it is not fare to be judging people at first thier impression but everyone does.

    I really liked your post and I will enjoy reading more from you in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Please note that Mallory did a wonderful job employing and engaging the concepts and content of the reading. As Amanda points out, she uses Omi and Winant to parse out her understanding of the reading.

    And, this is a nice set of comments. They are all thoughtful and considerate.

    Ryan makes an interesting point about prejudice. I am impressed with his willingness and ability to acknowledge his own prejudices. All of us "read" people and judge them based on sets of information available to us. While I disagree with Ryan's hypothetical decision to hire whites over people of color, I applaud his ability and willingness to acknowledge that he would do so. The next step, however, is to begin working through our prejudices and try to over come them.

    To illustrate what I mean, I'd like to talk about myself for a second. When I teach in a traditional classroom, I have found that I have a tendency to treat some students differently. I tend to trust women students more than I trust men. I also tend to distruct students who are in a fraternity or a sorority more. Why? Well, we all live in a society in which women are constructed as more honest and less likely to mislead than men. And, we tend to view greek organizations negatively. I have come to be aware of this and have done everything I can to work around my prejudices and to treat all students equally. It is challenging, but the starting point is acknowleding my own location and prejudices.

    ReplyDelete